domingo, 31 de julio de 2011

Photographer Captures Beauty in Communist Architecture

07/29/2011
A Vision in Concrete


The photographer Roman Bezjak spent five years traveling around Eastern Europe taking pictures of communist-era buildings. His images show grand gestures in concrete and weird constructions that could be in a science-fiction movie. His intention was not to judge the structures, but to show them from a new perspective.
photos: http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-70849.html

The photograph shows the Slovak National Gallery in Bratislava, in the former Czechoslovakia. Construction began in 1969, just a few months after Warsaw Pact troops brought a violent end to the period of liberalization known as the Prague Spring. In those days the Czech Republic and Slovakia were still one country. The building is a relic of the Soviet system, a piece of Communist authoritarian-style architecture.
The picture is just one in Roman Bezjak's book "Sozialistische Moderne - Archäologie einer Zeit" ("Socialist Modernism - Archeology of an Era"). A professor of photography at Bielefeld's University of Applied Sciences, Bezjak made repeated trips to Eastern Europe over a period spanning five years, tracking down examples of socialist architectural style. He has now collected these into a large-format photo book of post-war architecture from countries including Poland, Lithuania, Serbia, Hungary, Ukraine and Georgia.
The buildings vary widely. There are the grandiose constructions along the lines of the National Gallery in Bratislava -- attempts to express communism's visionary energy through opulent stylistic elements, enormous grand gestures and experimental constructions like something from a science fiction movie. But there are also the prefabricated concrete apartment blocks and the pallid façades of multi-purpose halls and shopping centers, whose cheap concrete elements tell tales of poverty and bleak conformity.
Buildings that Break out of the Usual Framework
The idea for this mammoth project first came to Bezjak during his travels as a photojournalist in the 1990s. "I've always been fascinated by these buildings," he says, "but I wasn't sure how to put them in context." In his assignments for German publications such as MerianFrankfurter Allgemeine ZeitungGeo and SPIEGEL, Bezjak says, the designs always expressed the difficult societal conditions in the countries in question. Now, Bezjak emphasizes, his purpose in this project is to bring the buildings' aesthetic appeal to the foreground, and he hopes viewers can approach the pictures with a "gaze uncontaminated by ideology."
Still, Bezjak hasn't refrained entirely from commenting on the architecture. He developed strict formal guidelines for his series, photographing it all with a large-format camera and always with the same lens. "I photographed everything that fit within this frame -- in terms of the buildings' dimensions, but also in terms of the possibilities for distancing oneself from the building -- and not the rest," he says.
The result is a collection of images unlike those found in any travel report. His photographs don't try to shrink megalomaniac styles to a scale comprehensible to the eye; they also don't devote themselves completely to a fascination with the architecture's sheer size, as for example in another recently published photo book,"Cosmic Communist Constructions," by French photographer Frédéric Chaubin. Bezjak repeatedly breaks out of the usual photographic idiom.
Take the television tower in Riga, Latvia. Bezjak prunes this approximately 370-meter (1210-foot) tower down to a flat, gray supply bunker from which three gigantic struts loom, only to end abruptly a few dozen meters above in a rust-colored structure, because the upper edge of the picture's horizontal format cuts off the rest. As a result, one of the world's tallest TV and radio towers becomes a meaningless architectural stump, captured by the lens of a photographer looking to show not spectacular enormity, but instead something akin to the fleeting glance of a passerby, for whom the view is simply part of daily life.
'Relatively Intuitive'
Bezjak found many of his photographic subjects from that perspective, the viewpoint of someone simply out for a stroll. "It was relatively intuitive," he says. "I went somewhere where I could climb up high and get a view over the city, and from there I could already see most of these buildings."
To take his pictures, however, Bezjak returned to the city's sidewalks. His photographs, often taken from the opposite side of the street, reflect a passerby's perspective, as journalist Till Briegleb notes in one of his texts that accompany the photographs in Bezjak's book.
In this way, many of Bezjak's photographic subjects look somewhat incidental. The seemingly endless lines of a concrete apartment block in Gdansk, Poland, become a flatteringly patterned surface, while floral ornaments on an event hall in Chemitz, Germany, turn into fancy décor.
Still, some shocks lurk beneath this superficial aesthetic. One example is a pair of pictures of damaged buildings. Their pockmarked facades are certain to tempt some viewers to romanticize the rundown nature of Eastern Europe. A glance at the captions, however, confronts the viewer with these locations' true history -- the pictures were taken in Belgrade and Sarajevo, and the damage was caused by bombs and grenade fragments in the 1990s.
A Failed System, But Also Home
Bezjak's photographs repeatedly met with incomprehension from Eastern European colleagues. Some, he says, couldn't believe anyone would photograph these socialist concrete blocks and grandiose constructions. "They don't want these buildings to be viewed that way and they can't understand why anyone would focus on this phenomenon," Bezjak says. For older colleagues especially, he adds, the project comes across as an attempt to retrospectively redeem socialism's image.
Bezjak asked himself this same question at first -- how critical did the project need to be? Ultimately, he decided against pointing a figure in his photographs. His rationale is that "a book that sets out only to show how terrible and degrading it all was, that's the hegemonic view on the part of the West, which considers itself superior to the East."
Besides, Western Europe's post-war modernism is sometimes indistinguishable from Socialist architecture. One example is Germany's chain of Horton department stores, with their uniform tile facades designed by Egon Eiermann.
Bezjak says he himself grew up in buildings not unlike the ones he photographed for his book, having moved with his parents at the age of three, in the mid-1960s, from Yugoslavia to the small city of Hilden in western Germany, where the family lived in a housing development on the edge of the town.
Perhaps this is another reason why it's important to the photographer that his book show that for the people who live in them, these buildings are not just relics of a failed system, but also home. "That can't be measured according to aesthetic or social categories, but only in terms of memories," he says.

miércoles, 27 de julio de 2011

Small Scale, Big Change: New Architectures of Social Engagement

 This exhibition presents eleven architectural projects on five continents that respond to localized needs in underserved communities. These innovative designs signal a renewed sense of commitment, shared by many of today’s practitioners, to the social responsibilities of architecture. Though this stance echoes socially engaged movements of the past, the architects highlighted here are not interested in grand manifestos or utopian theories. Instead, their commitment to a radical pragmatism can be seen in the projects they have realized, from a handmade school in Bangladesh to a reconsideration of a modernist housing project in Paris, from an apartheid museum in South Africa to a cable car that connects a single hillside barrio in Caracas to the city at large. These works reveal an exciting shift in the longstanding dialogue between architecture and society, in which the architect’s methods and approaches are being dramatically reevaluated. They also propose an expanded definition of sustainability that moves beyond experimentation with new materials and technologies to include such concepts as social and economic stewardship. Together, these undertakings not only offer practical solutions to known needs, but also aim to have a broader effect on the communities in which they work, using design as a tool. 

View exhibition site:
http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2010/smallscalebigchange/

Beyond the Exhibition

Internet-based architecture communities such as the The 1%, urbaninform, and Open Architecture Network are forums for the dissemination and development of knowledge, expertise, and innovation among architects and other contributors. Open-source sharing—wherein concepts, proposals, and sometimes architectural plans and drawings (for built and unbuilt structures) are made freely available—is a common feature of these networks and a catalyst for the actualization of projects or the recycling or improvement of ideas. This in turn enables architects to respond efficiently to the needs of underserved communities. While their methods and results are varied, each of these three networks is founded on the belief that architecture and architects have a social responsibility that can be advanced and facilitated by the Internet.
The 1%
The 1% was initiated in 2002 by Public Architecture, a San Francisco-based firm founded by John Peterson. The program is a call to action; it asks American architects to each dedicate a minimum of one percent of his or her time—or twenty hours each year—to unpaid work for a nonproft organization. The Web site connects designers with clients, it advocates for nonprofits, and it helps to ensure the suitability and integration of the resulting collaborations. Some 820 firms and 400 nonprofit organizations are registered; around 160 projects are currently underway.
urbaninform
Created by Rainer Hehl and Jörg Stollmann in 2009 in Zurich, urbaninform collects and showcases short video documentaries, or “mini docs,” that explore ideas and interventions within informal cities—settlements built with little or no professional planning. Connecting practitioners within this specialized field, urbaninform is becoming a central forum for critical discourse and debate on ways to improve life in urban settlements.
Open Architecture Network
The Open Architecture Network (OAN) is a subsection of Architecture for Humanity (AFH), a nonprofit design firm founded in 1999 by Cameron Sinclair in San Francisco. The Web site links AFH chapters around the world and also connects independent design professionals with previous and potential clients. Encouraging designers, builders, and clients to share architectural documents, drawings, and plans with others, OAN aims to limit duplication in design development and to encourage improvements on existing projects. The site presents a large number of projects—over 3,100—in a range of programs and levels of completion.

martes, 26 de julio de 2011

Social Architecture Manifesto




Hack:Social Architecture (a manifesto)

by Luc Galoppin - COO at MedeMerkers

July 18, 2011 at 6:27am
Download Link
http://www.managementexchange.com/sites/default/files/SOCIAL%20ARCHITECTURE%20EBOOK.pdf

How do Education Africa’s Social Architecture projects work?

What is Social Architecture?
Social Architecture applies the theories of affordable building to impoverished areas inhabited by the poorest of the poor, whose facilities are inadequate and/or non-existent.

The design and building concepts of an international partner university are implemented for the creation of the physical structures, and students from the university come to construct the building, thus encouraging social tourism and the transfer of skills from the university students to unemployed and often uneducated, locals.

How do Education Africa’s Social Architecture projects work?

These socially effective design build projects are incorporated into the academic programme of the partner university where their students design the structure, and a number of students are then selected to physically come and build the facilities over a 6 - 7 week period. We encourage the construction of pre-schools and pre-school training centres which we link to our Education Africa ECD (Early Childhood Development) project. The international students are also involved in raising funds for the project.

The centres are designed and constructed by the students using simple inexpensive local building materials, while applying innovative solutions to architectural problems. Often, the students include unemployed local residents in the building of the facilities in order to encourage skills transfer.

Education Africa identifies projects, local partners; obtain permission from relevant departments and stakeholders, and sources accommodation and food for students, where possible at reduced rates or through donations. Education Africa, through our ECD project, also helps to ensure that partners and structures are in place so that the centres will be run and maintained effectively, once built.


http://www.educationafrica.com/social_architecture.htm

Leader as social architect…

by GEORGE AMBLER on MARCH 24, 2008

The need for effective "social architectures" within organisation is critical if we are too ensure that we develop future leaders, to drive innovation and to create an organisation that has a great legacy. If we examine our leadership, I’m sure we’ll find that meetings are where we do much, if not most, of our leading.
Peter Block in his book “The Answer to How is Yes” discusses the importance of the leaders’ role as social architect which he describes as follows:
"Where the architect designs physical space, the social architect designs social space….. the role of the social architect is to create service-orientated organisations, businesses, governments, and schools that meet their institutional objectives in a way that gives those involved space to act on what matters to them…. The social architect’s task is to create the space for people to act on what matters to them."
Social architecture is about leading in a way that creates space for what matters! To focus on creating the necessary conditions for acting on what matters is one of the most urgent needs of organisations today. Peter Block goes on to say that "Acting on what matters is an act of leadership, it is not dependent on the leadership of others." This means we all need to take responsibility for our choices and our actions. Leadership is a choice, it’s a decision we make to act on what matters. Issues such as integrity, responsibility, and authenticity are all issues that matter.

The five capabilities of the social architect

Peter Block describe the following five capabilities as being necessary for the social architect to be effective. Paradoxically much on these ‘capabilities’ seem to get lost in the organisation we work in today…
  1. Convening: "Social architecture is fundamentally, a convening function, giving particular attention to all aspects of how people gather. The future is created as a collective act…… The fundamental tenet of social architecture is that the way people gather is critical to the way the system functions." In many organisations meetings are seen as a ‘necessary evil’, something to be tolerated, in between more important events. The consideration of how people gather and meet is of secondary importance.
  2. Naming the question: "The social architect has an obligation to define the context, or the playing field, and then define the right questions, at least to start with". Too many people dive into the how, selling solutions and describing best practices. Not enough people lead by taking the time to understand the quest that matters.
  3. Initiating new conversations for learning: "To sustain the habitability of a social system we must initiate new conversations and manage the airspace so that all voices stay engaged with each other." Too many conversations in organisations are initiated to ‘align’ people to lead them towards a predetermined answer, with not enough learning happening.
  4. Sticking with strategies of engagement and consent: "…dialogue itself is part of the solution…. Commitment and accountability cannot be sold. They have to be evoked, and evocation comes through conversation." Organisations change through effective conversation.
  5. Designing strategies that support local choice: "If our intent is to create a social system that people want to inhabit then the social architect’s job is to demand that the inhabitants join in designing the system."
Looking at the above list it seems that organisations are failing in their ability to create social systems that encourage people to act on what matters. Instead organisation are creating systems of compliance. What has been the result of your leadership?
http://www.thepracticeofleadership.net/leader-as-social-architect

Educator Journal: In the Making—Social Architecture


Posted by Calder Zwicky, Associate Educator, Teen and Community Programs
For this series of posts, I’ve asked the teaching artists from this season’s In the Making Art Classes to reflect on what they’ve been doing over the past couple of weeks with their teenaged students. Each In the Making class meets once a week—Tuesday or Thursday nights—and focuses on introducing the participants to the materials, techniques, artistic theories, and exhibitions currently on view in MoMA’s galleries. It’s a great way for teens to find a community of positive, creative peers outside of a high school setting, and all classes are offered completely free of charge to the participating students. For this entry, teaching artist Grace Hwang explores her process of introducing students to the themes and philosophies behind our Small Scale, Big Change: New Architectures of Social Engagement exhibition.
—Calder Zwicky, Associate Educator, Teen and Community Programs

Social Architecture students at The Metropolitan Museum of Art's Big Bambú installation, by Doug and Mike Starn (2010).
For the past seven weeks, the teens and I have been studying the latest practices and projects around the world that engage communities’ current social issues and serve their needs for housing and transportation as well. We’ve been using the following question as a guidepost as we move through this ten-week class: Can an answer to social issues such as poverty be found within the design of our city’s buildings and community spaces? At this point, I think that most of the students in class would answer with a resounding YES!
In the first class, I had the students imagine temporary dwellings for our families based on the traditional Jewish festival of Sukkot, following the holiday’s strict parameters for design. Kiersten Nash, an artist and designer here in NYC, met with the class and shared her entry to the Sukkah City Design Competition, currently on view at the Center for Architecture.
Leaving the confines of MoMA’s classrooms, we navigated the Starn Brothers’ evolving Big Bambúinstallation on the roof of The Metropolitan Museum of Art and tried our hands at proposing a rooftop sculpture for the museum—one that would respond to its situated environment: both in the context of the Museum’s roof, as well as from within Central Park.
We’ve studied the projects in the Small Scale, Big Change: Architectures for Social Engagement exhibition as well, and brought the teens through the show on a fascinating guided tour given to us by Andres Lepik, the exhibition’s curator, and curatorial assistant Margot Weller. Andres introduced us to the idea of architects acting as editors: finding improvements to existing structures, as opposed to creating new building projects altogether.

Left: Curator Andres Lepik takes the teens through the Small Scale, Big Change exhibition. Right: Curatorial assistant Margot Weller describes a section of the exhibition.
What we’ve begun to see is that what makes architecture social is not only that it responds to basic needs to survive (for both humans and the environment), but that it also responds to what we need for our society to thrive: spaces that strengthen the social fabric of a community, and building practices that honor native architecture and establish local pride.
The teens are currently researching and tackling issues near to our hearts: homelessness in NYC, literacy in rural China, the energy crises in Pakistan, overpopulation in Hong Kong… to name just a few. Like the exhibition from which we have been drawing our inspiration, the class is a small seed of an idea, with big implications for change!
Come see the students’ solutions at the Fall 2010 In the Making Exhibition, on view from December 17 to January 20 in MoMA’s Cullman Education and Research Building.
http://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2010/11/24/educator-journal-in-the-making-social-architecture

Relearning the Social: Architecture and Change

REVIEW: QUILIAN RIANO




Anna Heringer and Eike Rosway, METI - Handmade School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, 2004–06. [Image: Kurt Hörbst. All images courtesy of the Museum of Modern Art]

Early in the 20th century, leading architects were fluent in the language — the practice — of social change. Trailblazing figures like Le Corbusier, Gropius and Mies were preoccupied, even obsessed, with deploying technological advances to make cities healthier and housing more affordable, and they relentlessly advanced their agendas not only through building projects but also in books like The Radiant City and Towards a New Architecture, in prototype exhibitions like the Weissenhofsiedlung, in institutions like the Congrès International d'Architecture Moderne and at schools like the Bauhaus. By the end of the 20th century, that fluency was long gone. Too many of the large aspirations remained unfulfilled, and what once seemed heroic had come to look hubristic, even naive. By the time I entered architecture school, earlier in this decade, it was clear that the rhetoric of social responsibility had been marginalized, crowded out of the mainstream by the heady opportunities for signature design during the long boom. 

With "Small Scale, Big Change: New Architectures of Social Engagement," the Museum of Modern Art in New York City is attempting to reengage — to relearn and reteach — the language of the social. Curated by Andres Lepik, the exhibition, which opened on October 3 and runs through January 3, focuses on eleven recent projects that, in the words of the exhibition wall text, "bring innovative architecture to underserved communities." The text acknowledges the precedent of the early modernists even as it negotiates a strategic distance. "The renewed commitment of these architects and many of their colleagues to socially responsible architecture is reminiscent of the ideals of the twentieth-century masters, but these designers eschew their predecessors' utopian, wholesale blueprints for change imposed from above." In contrast, the projects on view are all "radically pragmatic, 'acupunctural' projects — limited interventions with wide-ranging effects." 






Top: Anna Heringer and Eike Rosway, METI - Handmade School, Rudrapur, Bangladesh, 2004–06. [Image: Kurt Hörbst] Bottom: Frédéric Druot, Anne Lacaton, Jean Philippe Vassal, Rendering for Transformation of Bois-le-Prêtre Tower, 2006–11. [Image: Druot, Lacaton & Vassal]

This is unquestionably big-spirited, and, following closely on "Rising Currents," this latest exhibition reinforces MoMA's increasing focus on social and environmental issues, on the topical and political rather than the formal and aesthetic. And yet "Small Scale, Big Change" suggests also the extent to which the field is struggling to regain command of a once familiar set of skills, a language long ignored, for the message of the exhibition seems diffuse, even unclear. 

To a significant degree this results from the sheer variety of the works on display. The eleven projects span five continents (only Australia and Antarctica go unrepresented) and more than a decade. They are by different designers, working with different programs, with different construction technologies and material palettes, in different cultural contexts and — despite the unifying title — at different scales. As Alexandra Lange noted last week, onChange Observer, this kind of diversity "creates a lack of cohesion and, ultimately, conclusion." 

It is hard, for instance, to trace a strong connection between a project like METI – Handmade School, by Anna Heringer and Eike Roswag, and the Transformation of the Tour Bois-le-Prêtre, by Frédéric Druot, Anne Lacaton and Jean Philippe Vassal. Located in a Bangladeshi village, the Handmade School, which originated as Heringer's master's thesis, makes ingenious use of traditional local materials such as earth, clay, sand, straw and bamboo to create a small two-story school, with classrooms and play caves. In contrast, the Tour Bois-le-Prêtre is a renovated public housing high-rise; the prominent French firm Lacaton & Vassal, which won a competition sponsored by the City of Paris, has proposed extending the units' floor slabs and attaching prefabricated modular pods to give tenants more space and light. Both Handmade and Bois-le-Prêtre are innovative; but is that enough to bridge the gap in client, budget, program, technology and scale? 






Top: Urban-Think Tank, Metro Cable, Caracas, Venezuela, 2007–10. [Image: Iwan Baan] Bottom: Red Location Museum of Struggle, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 1998–2005. [Image: Iwan Baan]

Other projects range widely as well. Metro Cable, by Urban-Think Tank, is a politically complex intervention, a new cable car line linking the barrios of Caracas with the city's official transit system; after years of development, and with the support of Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, the line began service earlier this year. Surely the impact of this infrastructure-scale project will be more extensive than that of the Red Location Museum, located in a black township in Port Elizabeth, South Africa; the museum, designed by Noero Wolff Architects, and dedicated to the struggle against apartheid, is a sophisticated but singular institution, whose effects will inevitably be indirect. 

A further complication of "Small Scale, Big Change" is the fact the some projects are built, while others remain unrealized. In the latter category are the Manguinhos Complex, by Jorge Mario Jáuregui/Metrópolis Projetos Urbanos, which will comprise elevating a rail line and creating a linear park just below, for a district of favelas in Rio de Janeiro; and Casa Familiar: Living Rooms at the Border and Senior Housing with Childcare, by Estudio Teddy Cruz, a pilot housing project in San Ysidro, California, just north of the U.S.-Mexican border near Tijuana. (In the spirit of disclosure: I have been working with Teddy Cruz on a project in Central America.) In both of these projects the architects have been focusing not just on built results; they are using the process of designing and producing architecture as an opportunity to spur social change. Jáuregui/MPU conducted extensive meetings and interviews with the local community to assure that the projects met local needs with minimum demolition and cultural disruption. Estudio Teddy Cruz set up a similarly participatory process, and used the project to lobby for new density and land-use regulations in San Ysidro, to better reflect the realities of immigrant life. It is unfortunate that the exhibition, which is packed with objects and drawings, has not found a way to reflect these dynamic and engaging methods.

In the case of built works, too, the exhibition puts more emphasis on well-crafted models and beautiful drawings than on the less imageable criteria and metrics that would allow us to evaluate the actual impact of the works. To be sure, it is not hard to believe that these projects are highly positive for their communities. $20K House VIII (Dave's House), by the Rural Studio at Auburn University, marks the Studio's efforts to develop a repeatable model for affordable housing in Hale County, Alabama — to move beyond the provision of individual houses for particular families. The Quinta Monroy Housing, by Elemental, consists of almost 100 units of bare-bones housing in Iquique, Chile, intended to be customizable through the sweat equity of the low-income tenants. The Primary School, a project launched by architect Diébédo Francis Kéré, traces the renovation of a decrepit school in Kéré's hometown of Gando, Burkina Faso. Another education project, Inner-City Arts, by Michael Maltzan Architeture, occupies a one-acre campus in Skid Row in Los Angeles, where impoverished kids can take art classes. Housing for the Fishermen of Tyre, by Hashim Sarkis A.L.U.D., culminates a decade-long effort to provide decent living quarters for Lebanese workers whose industry has been hurt by years of war and political conflict.






Top: Jorge Mario Jauregui, Rendering for Manguinhos Complex, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2006–10. [Image: Robson Coutinho]  Bottom: Rural Studio, Auburn University, $20K House VIII, Newbern, Alabama, 2009. [Image: Timothy Hursley]

All of the projects in the exhibition thrive on their own ingenuity. Yet it would have been illuminating to learn more about how exactly they are driving "big change." The exhibition never really defines what it means by change, however, and so we are left wondering, from project to project, and scale to scale: Change from what? To what purpose? And we might wonder as well: What is the role of architecture in bringing about change? To what extent does the quality of a design make a difference? Do the architectural achievements of the Primary School or the Handmade School or Inner-City Arts matter as much as the skill and dedication of the educational non-profits they house?

These aren't easy questions. If architects could quantify the impact of their designs, the discipline would be much more powerful — and questions of social change would occupy the main line of the profession and the academy. Ultimately "Small Scale, Big Change" is best understood as evidence of the disciplinary resolve to start up an old conversation — to move into the mainstream a movement long consigned to the edges, to the thankless realm of the "alterative." As is almost always the case at a major museum, the exhibition is more retrospective than projective; all of the projects have been published in the professional and academic literature and will be familiar within the field. But for a wider public this exhibition should serve as a timely introduction to more than a decade of work that signals a resurgent movement. Let's hope that MoMA and similar institutions remain focused, and help it to grow and mature. The Indonesian tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, the earthquake in Haiti, the floods in Pakistan, the BP oil spill, the global recession, the looming dislocations of global warming — there is no shortage of need for designs that can leverage small means to bring about big change.
http://places.designobserver.com/feature/relearning-the-social-architecture-and-change/19128/

What Is a Social Architecture?

Social architecture is the term used to describe the roles and responsibilities as well as governance arrangements that are used to design and implement relationships among family, market, community and state – the four sectors that we capture with the image of a welfare diamond.

Each country makes its own choices about the shape of its welfare diamond and therefore the relationships across sectors. For example, while all rely heavily on the labour market as the primary source of income, some (like Canada) are reluctant to allow markets to distribute access to all goods and services (such as health care or public education). While all countries assume that families have primary responsibility for ensuring the well-being of their children, some countries leave parents on their own to purchase what they can afford in the market, while others provide low cost or free services (early childhood education and care, for example) and/or ensure that parents have adequate income to meet the needs of their children.

Canada’s New Social Risks: Directions for a New Social Architecture
By
Jane Jenson

Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. (CPRN)
600 – 250 Albert Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6M1 Tel: (613) 567-7500 Fax: (613) 567-7640 Web Site: http://www.cprn.org

Por una arquitectura social y sostenible

ES MÁS que evidente el impacto social que la arquitectura genera en la población y en su entorno; de ahí la importancia que tiene el que los arquitectos aporten soluciones para lograr el mantenimiento del equilibrio que debe existir entre el desarrollo humano y la gestión ecológica de dicho entorno. Por lo que no cabe duda de que la sostenibilidad en su conjunto, incluida, por supuesto, la arquitectura, sólo será posible si los ciudadanos y sus dirigentes se la creen y apuestan por ella con algo más que palabras.
No olvidemos que el objetivo final de cualquier propuesta de sostenibilidad debe pasar por mejorar las condiciones de habitabilidad de la población; incluidas las de las generaciones futuras. Por consiguiente, de lo que se trata es de que, a través de la arquitectura y de la ingeniería -disciplinas cada vez más interrelacionadas-, también se pueda y se deba intentar llevar a cabo un cambio ético y social que abarque un modelo de desarrollo que sea, a su vez, un cambio de modelo de vida que tenga como objetivo, por qué no, la búsqueda de la felicidad de las personas que habitan un determinado lugar, que no sólo tiene por qué circunscribirse a un hogar, sino a todo lo relacionado con su entorno más inmediato: calles, plazas públicas, colegios, mercados, parques y jardines, centros comerciales?
Podemos decir, pues, que tenemos que apostar por una arquitectura que busque, o, al menos, promueva, la felicidad; al intentar que las viviendas se adapten a sus moradores y no al contrario; y que, además, éstas sean económicas para el bolsillo. Viviendas sencillas, tecnológicamente hablando, con iluminación y ventilación naturales, y con una sobriedad arquitectónica acorde con la necesaria funcionalidad de lo construido.
Por desgracia, hoy en día se ha trivializado mediáticamente incluso el ejercicio de la arquitectura; lo cual introduce una desventaja, al no poder cumplir con los mínimos exigidos para impulsar la arquitectura sostenible que la sociedad demanda y necesita. Muchos se oponen a estas iniciativas porque ello implicaría modificar los planes de urbanismo existentes, y sospechan -y sospechan bien- que iría contra los intereses de algunos especuladores al tener que construir viviendas de otro modo, o, incluso, dedicarse con más ahínco a la rehabilitación de los pisos ya construidos y que se encuentran en estado ruinoso.
Pocos promotores están dispuestos a construir viviendas sostenibles, entre otras razones porque los márgenes comerciales y de beneficios que normalmente se reparten la constructora, la inmobiliaria y el propietario del terreno -incluidos los ayuntamientos- implicaría ganar menos de lo que lo hacen en la actualidad. De hecho, una casa de nueva construcción de unos 450.000 euros se podría vender por no más de 150.000 euros y dando beneficios; pero obviamente no serían los 300.000 euros que hoy en día se podrían repartir; de ahí el hecho de que apenas existan en el mercado promociones sociales y sostenibles.
Por otra parte, una construcción, para llamarse sostenible, tendría que reunir unas mínimas condiciones de edificabilidad y habitabilidad, tales como la de poder autorregularse térmicamente sin aportes externos de ninguna clase; que los materiales de construcción hayan sido obtenidos sin que, a su vez, éstos hayan producido deshechos tóxicos; que las técnicas de construcción supongan un mínimo de deterioro medioambiental evitando, además, en lo posible, el impacto visual con el entorno; buscar la optimación de los recursos naturales de aquellos elementos que haya fabricado la mano del hombre; perseguir la disminución del consumo energético tanto en la construcción como en el posterior mantenimiento de la vivienda; aumentar el aislamiento de las paredes; vigilar en lo posible la orientación sur del edificio; permitir su transpirabilidad y su ventilación natural y soleada; reivindicar la importancia de los balcones y los ventanales, así como su ornamentación floral, junto a la creación de pequeños jardines verticales, porque ello contribuye a mejorar la calidad ambiental y paisajística del entorno urbano donde se haya construido la casa o el edificio, porque ello aporta color y calor a un paisaje normalmente desdibujado e impersonal?
En definitiva, la arquitectura sostenible debe ser social y comprometida, al intentar aprovechar los recursos naturales de manera que minimicen el impacto ambiental de la construcción sobre el ambiente natural que le rodea; en definitiva, una arquitectura que esté al servicio del hombre y que contribuya en lo posible a proporcionarle comodidad, bienestar y, por qué no, felicidad.
macost33@hotmail.com
http://www.eldia.es/2009-02-24/criterios/24-arquitectura-social-sostenible.htm

Arquitectura Social


 Proyectos de investigación dirigidos por el Dr. Joel Audefroy:
“Estrategias de prevención y adaptación a riesgos hidrometeorológicos” (20090409) + Proyecto FONCICYT-UE (2009-2011) con CIESAS.
Director: Joel Audefroy
Objetivos: Esta propuesta de recuperación de conocimiento culturalmente construido y asociado a la emergencia y prevención de los riesgos hidrometeorológicos en México tendrá tres finalidades en sí, a partir de tres ejes comparativos: 
- La reconstrucción de culturas de prevención a escala global con una mirada local/regional. Se tomarán en cuenta los riesgos hidrometeorológicos asociados con huracanes, tornados, inundaciones y sequías. 
- Las prácticas sociales y culturales en la sociedad mexicana. 
- Las prácticas tecnológicas y de mitigación de riesgos en el campo de la vivienda e infraestructura.
Productos: Libro, Conferencias nacionales e internacionales.
“Viviendas seguras y sustentables: identificación y evaluación de mejores prácticas” (20082195)
Director: Joel Audefroy
Objetivos: Formular modelos de hábitat sustentable para la prevención, emergencia y reconstrucción frente a desastres naturales y antrópicos que afectan a los asentamientos humanos, desde la experiencia internacional y desde sus realidades locales a partir de su identificación y análisis. Objetivos específicos: 
1. Analizar la producción habitacional en México en relación a riesgos de tipo meteorológicos y geológicos. 
2. Identificar experiencias y propuestas de hábitat sustentable a nivel internacional en las tres fases de un desastre. 
3. Evaluar las experiencias exitosas, y las mejores prácticas de emergencia y reconstrucción. 
4. Elaborar una síntesis de las mejores prácticas en materia de hábitat sustentable contra desastres considerando lo que se puede aplicar al contexto mexicano.
Productos: Libro: Joel Audefroy, con la colaboración de Nelly Cabrera, 2009, Emergencia y reconstrucción de vivienda después de desastres: Las experiencias latinoamericanas y asiáticas, HIC-AL /IPN, México.180 pp.
“Riesgos y vulnerabilidad en la ZMCM: modelos geoespaciales” (20070462) + (CONACYT 52353-H).
Director: Joel Audefroy
Objetivos: Identificar, analizar, integrar y sintetizar variables e indicadores asociados al hábitat humano construido, que caracterizan los niveles de vulnerabilidad y riesgo por amenazas naturales y antrópicas a considerar en los modelos de prevención y adaptación en referencia por la experiencia y realidades del Valle de la Ciudad de México. 
Sistematizar propuestas o alternativas de prevención y/o adaptación dentro de los modelos diseñados a partir de mapas cruzados para solucionar las deficiencias que generan la vulnerabilidad y el riesgo en el hábitat, destacando los efectos generados por la combinación vulnerabilidad social y económica con los riesgos naturales y/o antrópicos.
Productos: Libro: Joel Audefroy, con la colaboración de Nelly Cabrera, 2008, Riesgos y vulnerabilidad en la ZMCM, HIC-AL/ESIA-IPN, México, 119pp. ISBN: 979-9067-11-7.



Proyectos de investigación dirigidos por el Dr. Milton Montejano Castillo: 
“Tipologías Urbanas como indicador potencial de riesgo hidrometereológico en asentamientos humanos vulnerables” (20090079)
Director: Milton Montejano Castillo
Objetivos: Desarrollar una herramienta de planeación urbana para estimar la vulnerabilidad de poblaciones urbanas periféricas y rurales sujetas a riesgos hidrometeorológicos, en función de su estructura física espacial.
Productos: en elaboración

Proyectos de investigación dirigidos por el Dr. Gerardo Torres Zárate: 
“Transferencia tecnológica para la vivienda rural” (20090100)
Objetivo.- Determinar cómo las tecnologías tradicionales de la vivienda  vernácula, sirven como una alternativa para construir  cubiertas a bajo costo y en menor tiempo que las tecnologías contemporáneas 
Productos y subproductos obtenidos: (a la fecha, junio) Disco compacto con el desarrollo de la investigación y los modelos de cubiertas propuestas así como un prototipo de pie de casa para familias en extrema pobreza en el medio rural. Publicación de libro (En edición). Dos  tesistas Graduados Maestría. Dos tesistas titulado licenciatura. Una conferencia internacional
“Vivienda vernácula y el modelo espacial prehispánico”  (20080095) 
Objetivo.- Explicar la relación entre el espacio arquitectónico de la vivienda vernácula actual y el espacio prehispánico.
Productos y subproductos obtenidos: Un CD, con el estudio y resultados del proyecto. Tres tesistas titulados licenciatura. Dos artículos de divulgación. Una conferencia nacional.

“Tecnologías apropiables para la vivienda rural” (20070085)
Objetivo.- Explicar la relación entre los sistemas constructivos industrializados y la baja calidad de edificación y funcionalidad de la vivienda rural. Aplicar una solución de sistema constructivo de tecnología apropiable en la vivienda
Productos y subproductos obtenidos: Un CD, con el estudio y la propuesta de un sistema constructivo de tecnología apropiable para una comunidad rural. Cinco tesistas titulados licenciatura. Una conferencia internacional.
Proyectos de investigación dirigidos por el Dr. Tarsicio Pastrana Salcedo:
“Arquitectura del centenario en la Ciudad de México” (20091036)
Director: Dr. Tarsicio Pastrana Salcedo 
Objetivos: Análisis arquitectónico de edificios realizados para festejar el centenario de la independencia en la ciudad de México, programas arquitectónicos, sistemas constructivos, distribuciones espaciales, elementos estéticos.  Encontrar constantes de identificación espacial enfocadas al estudio y la restauración de los espacios arquitectónicos


http://www.sepi.esiatec.ipn.mx/wps/wcm/connect/sepiesiatecamachalco/SEPIESIATECAMACHALCO/Inicio/LINEAS_DE_INVESTIGACION/Arquitectura_Social/